|
<< prev | goto page
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:07 pm 
ha! speak for your self!! wait that was conceded... |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jan 2005 | Posts: 816 | Location: Davidson, NC
|
|
   |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:08 pm
starnothing wrote: haha youre right that goes really well
you can start with urbandictionary lol there are several already listed, but not the def. granpaturtle is proclaiming... http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=eisley&r=f |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:45 pm
haha. i like it. _________________ i am cold, too cool to call you, far too stoned to leave my bed. i'll write this song to win your kiss but stay asleep instead. |
|
|
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 | Posts: 494 | Location: Chicago/Evanston (IL)
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 3:18 pm
IHeartYourTelescopeEyes wrote: end MORAINE wrote: I don't like the idea. People are going to think Eisley is concieted enough to name themselves after a word whose definition implies exceeding the two t's in "hott". au cobtraire, it was conceived by a fan, so they would think their fans are conceited No one is going to look for the history behind the word. They'll just know "eisley" means sexy, and there is a band named eisley. I mean, how did "radical" become a substitute for cool? |
|
|
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 | Posts: 839 | Location: Aurora, IL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 3:40 pm
end MORAINE wrote: I mean, how did "radical" become a substitute for cool? what year are you living in?  _________________ welcome to the no pants club boone |
|
|
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 | Posts: 8693 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 7:25 pm
Is that gonig to be the "fo-shizzle" for the hot topic crowd? 
Cause if it is, I have to make up my mind about it. _________________ ~London Calling Speak The Slang Now~ |
|
|
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 | Posts: 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 9:53 am
granpaturtle wrote: end MORAINE wrote: I mean, how did "radical" become a substitute for cool? what year are you living in? 2005. I'm not saying it's still in style, that has NOTHING to do with the point I'm making. Try and stay with me here. At one point in time the word "radical" didn't mean anything, until one day someone substituted it for the word "cool". Now, say just before the time "radical" was becoming a mainstream word for "cool", a band were to have named themselves Radical. It would be nearly impossible to pin point the day "radical" became a synonym for cool, so people would assume the band Radical named themselves after the word even though it was simply coincidental. For all you slower-minded folk, you can replace the word "Radical" with "Krunk" if that makes things more simple. |
|
|
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 | Posts: 839 | Location: Aurora, IL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 10:07 am
end MORAINE wrote: granpaturtle wrote: end MORAINE wrote: I mean, how did "radical" become a substitute for cool? what year are you living in? 2005. I'm not saying it's still in style, that has NOTHING to do with the point I'm making. Try and stay with me here. At one point in time the word "radical" didn't mean anything, until one day someone substituted it for the word "cool". Now, say just before the time "radical" was becoming a mainstream word for "cool", a band were to have named themselves Radical. It would be nearly impossible to pin point the day "radical" became a synonym for cool, so people would assume the band Radical named themselves after the word even though it was simply coincidental. For all you slower-minded folk, you can replace the word "Radical" with "Krunk" if that makes things more simple. yeah, i was making a joke...i see your point, saw it from the start, didn't care to comment on anything but your choice of the word radical _________________ welcome to the no pants club boone |
|
|
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 | Posts: 8693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 3:12 pm
granpaturtle wrote: end MORAINE wrote: granpaturtle wrote: end MORAINE wrote: I mean, how did "radical" become a substitute for cool? what year are you living in? 2005. I'm not saying it's still in style, that has NOTHING to do with the point I'm making. Try and stay with me here. At one point in time the word "radical" didn't mean anything, until one day someone substituted it for the word "cool". Now, say just before the time "radical" was becoming a mainstream word for "cool", a band were to have named themselves Radical. It would be nearly impossible to pin point the day "radical" became a synonym for cool, so people would assume the band Radical named themselves after the word even though it was simply coincidental. For all you slower-minded folk, you can replace the word "Radical" with "Krunk" if that makes things more simple. yeah, i was making a joke...i see your point, saw it from the start, didn't care to comment on anything but your choice of the word radical Man, maybe I'm living in the past, but I still say "rad" |
|
|
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 | Posts: 839 | Location: Aurora, IL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 3:43 pm
I feel you man, I still say "boss" _________________ ROCK ME AMADEUS!! "I was on tour in the United States back in '89 and we did a show in Cincinnati. During that show I shouted out, 'It's great to be in Cincinnati!' That was a lie." -David Bowie |
|
|
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 | Posts: 649 | Location: Gotham City, Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> "eisley" in websters
Page 2 of 2 << prev | goto page
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
