|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:57 am 
Awwwwwe they're so good! You used a real camera, didn't you? Or at least a fancy digital one. Because those are not the product of a regular person with a stinky digital. _________________ my name's carrie and i love a good sandwich so if you have a sandwich, come roll with me! 
i'm gonna marry the mars volta. |
|
|
Joined: 01 Nov 2003 | Posts: 8260 | Location: new hampshire
|
|
   |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:08 am
yeah, looking at those pictures made me cringe when i saw mine again... my camera is poo _________________ THE AUDIOSCROBBLER! My Beloved Xangatron! El mYspaceico |
|
|
Joined: 10 Apr 2005 | Posts: 341 | Location: Tinley Park, IL
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:16 am
cgar7 wrote: Jon is looking something sexy in that second pic jon is always looking sexy, what are you talking about? _________________ ROCK ME AMADEUS!! "I was on tour in the United States back in '89 and we did a show in Cincinnati. During that show I shouted out, 'It's great to be in Cincinnati!' That was a lie." -David Bowie |
|
|
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 | Posts: 649 | Location: Gotham City, Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:22 am
freakin sweet Jamie  _________________ http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/Gameboybob/ http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=gameboybob http://www.myspace.com/thegameboy |
|
|
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 | Posts: 5453 | Location: Nagoya, Japan
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:37 am
these are really good! i like this one http://www.endecision.com/eisley62505/sherristacynyc_0432.jpg |
|
|
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 | Posts: 273 | Location: new york
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 3:59 am
Ha, thanks, everyone. I used a Nikon D1 digital SLR. It's starting to be kind of old technology wise, but holds up to most anything. I set it at 1600 ISO, and shot mostly around 1/40 at f/1.8 or something like that. The white balance was set on the tungsten setting. Maybe I closed the aperture a little, or shot closer to 1/60, because the lighting was so decent. I'll have to look at the exif stuff sometime if y'all want. I also used a really fast 50mm Nikon lens. I love that thing. Anyway, there's my technobabble. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:00 am
oh man! it looks like it was an awesome show!! i wish i could have gone. |
|
|
Joined: 01 Jan 2004 | Posts: 37 | Location: Long Island, New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:05 am
TheAntrider wrote: Ha, thanks, everyone.
I used a Nikon D1 digital SLR. It's starting to be kind of old technology wise, but holds up to most anything. I set it at 1600 ISO, and shot mostly around 1/40 at f/1.8 or something like that. The white balance was set on the tungsten setting. Maybe I closed the aperture a little, or shot closer to 1/60, because the lighting was so decent. I'll have to look at the exif stuff sometime if y'all want. I also used a really fast 50mm Nikon lens. I love that thing. Anyway, there's my technobabble. 1600 ISO? Woo hoo for not needing flash! I wish I had more than a crappy digital camera, and a crappy Canon 35mm from the 80's with a stinky lens. :[ _________________ my name's carrie and i love a good sandwich so if you have a sandwich, come roll with me!
i'm gonna marry the mars volta. |
|
|
Joined: 01 Nov 2003 | Posts: 8260 | Location: new hampshire
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 5:47 am
hisownshot wrote: TheAntrider wrote: Ha, thanks, everyone.
I used a Nikon D1 digital SLR. It's starting to be kind of old technology wise, but holds up to most anything. I set it at 1600 ISO, and shot mostly around 1/40 at f/1.8 or something like that. The white balance was set on the tungsten setting. Maybe I closed the aperture a little, or shot closer to 1/60, because the lighting was so decent. I'll have to look at the exif stuff sometime if y'all want. I also used a really fast 50mm Nikon lens. I love that thing. Anyway, there's my technobabble. 1600 ISO? Woo hoo for not needing flash! I wish I had more than a crappy digital camera, and a crappy Canon 35mm from the 80's with a stinky lens. :[ That's where a DSLR whacks these point-and-shoot cameras... Quick shutterspeeds + high ISO, and clearer brighter images than a P&S @ ISO400 ~1/10 - 1/15... blah Anyways... great pics Ant... and thank you! 
|
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 | Posts: 472 | Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:44 am
Cool! Keep postin' pics guys! _________________ Don't you let them tell you you're an ugly child. They are blind to the beauty that lies within |
|
|
Joined: 05 Feb 2005 | Posts: 814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:48 pm
i wish i'd brought my camera. those are phenomenal jamie. good work. _________________ knives don't have your back. |
|
|
Joined: 07 Jun 2003 | Posts: 980 | Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 2:16 am
hisownshot wrote: Awwwwwe they're so good! You used a real camera, didn't you? Or at least a fancy digital one.
Because those are not the product of a regular person with a stinky digital. Jamie is a professional photojournalist. Kind of. TheAntrider wrote: Ha, thanks, everyone.
I used a Nikon D1 digital SLR. It's starting to be kind of old technology wise, but holds up to most anything. I set it at 1600 ISO, and shot mostly around 1/40 at f/1.8 or something like that. The white balance was set on the tungsten setting. Maybe I closed the aperture a little, or shot closer to 1/60, because the lighting was so decent. I'll have to look at the exif stuff sometime if y'all want. I also used a really fast 50mm Nikon lens. I love that thing. Anyway, there's my technobabble. Wow, they're real sharp for f1.8. It makes the focus rolloff look pretty nice, though. Pretty sharp for 1/40, too. Or even 1/60. Tripod? The digital camera I'm using (borrowed it from work) gets this weird colorful, splotchy noise when it's 400 or more ISO. I think it's noise because it's more noticeable in the shadows, and I think it's debayering from the CMOS chip. Was that ever an issue shooting at 1600? _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 2:47 am
i'm glad you posted these pictures jamie...they turned out just lovely. i can tell you that he didn't use a tripod...because i was standing right next to him. He's just got that steady hand man. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/whitewire4eva http://www.myspace.com/newparables |
|
|
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 | Posts: 85 | Location: Nashville, TN
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 3:35 am
Angela wrote: i'm glad you posted these pictures jamie...they turned out just lovely.
i can tell you that he didn't use a tripod...because i was standing right next to him. He's just got that steady hand man. You're welcome, and thanks.
Angela is right (of course) — no tripod. Though a tripod might be nice for getting people the heck out of the way. hmm. Noise is a problem at 1600, but it's not too bad. Those are really noisy compared to 200 and such. It's also harder to see at the smaller size at which I post these. I think one or two of those pictures are at 200 ISO because I forgot to change the setting. heh Anyway, I'll try to have my Philadelphia pictures up tonight after work. Hopefully I got a few good ones. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:11 am
very nice pictures. _________________ i am cold, too cool to call you, far too stoned to leave my bed. i'll write this song to win your kiss but stay asleep instead. |
|
|
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 | Posts: 494 | Location: Chicago/Evanston (IL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> New York City pictures
Page 2 of 3 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
