|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:46 am 
oosker wrote: Greg's is hilarious, I love it!
 sherri looks like she has hooker make-up on. hah. it's great. |
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
  |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:34 am
oosker wrote: Greg's is hilarious, I love it!
i really like the look of this actually, i think it's really..i don't know, cool i guess... gregorydymitrowicz wrote:  ah hahaha, this one made me laugh so hard... and i thought it would be really cool to have this picture on their new album... 
or something simular to it... _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
|
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
|
  |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:46 am
Kieran Anderson wrote:  Greg you make me giggle treetops12 wrote: I laughed really hard at this... nice work  I do my best 
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 | Posts: 3181 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:20 am
the igonorance motif wrote: welp, finished the back part of the eisley CD. again, thanks for the comments yall.
 ONLY 8 TRACKS!?? No no no no no. Albums must be at least 12, if not 15 tracks. Starflyer 59's Talking Vocie vs. Singing Voice has only 9 tracks. And they call it an album. It's amazing music but that's plain WRONG. nathan. _________________ "nathaniel" www.purevolume.com/GORADIO www.myspace.com/GORADIO www.myspace.com/natesmith |
|
|
Joined: 29 Mar 2005 | Posts: 211 | Location: Scotland
|
|
  |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:23 am
noodleman wrote: the igonorance motif wrote: welp, finished the back part of the eisley CD. again, thanks for the comments yall.
ONLY 8 TRACKS!?? No no no no no. Albums must be at least 12, if not 15 tracks. Starflyer 59's Talking Vocie vs. Singing Voice has only 9 tracks. And they call it an album. It's amazing music but that's plain WRONG. nathan. Technically the line between EP and album is 7 tracks. Sigur Ros' ( ) has eight tracks, several of which are rather lengthy, and it seems to me that fits the bill for a full album. Nevertheless, I fully agree that any Eisley album must have no less than 10 and preferably 12 or more. _________________ INTELLECT AND ROMANCE OVER BRUTE FORCE AND CYNICISM Smokemonster |
|
|
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 | Posts: 14510 | Location: Alone on an airplane, fallin' asleep against the windowpane...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:36 pm
i think the amount of songs and the length of the songs must be taken into consideration. _________________ operation hennessey |
|
|
Joined: 21 Jul 2006 | Posts: 14 | Location: Richmond, VA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:35 pm
Those are really sweet designs for all the albums you did, the igonorance motif. I liked the Eisley one the best though cause I felt like it fit Eisley fairly well, but like...a darker Eisley I guess. Though I don't know the other bands so I'm sort of biased there, but whatevuh. Good job. |
|
|
Joined: 01 Apr 2006 | Posts: 314 | Location: Greetings From Michigan, The Great Lakes State!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:22 pm
i presented the 3 concepts in class today, and my appastar/kashmir designs were scrapped. makes sense, since i spent most of my time on the eisley one. so naturally, everyone agreed that the eisley one was best and was strongest of three. lovely, time to refine it. again, thanks for comments everyone! you people, you're cool. for serious. [edit] to satisfy, i might throw in a few more track names. for kicks and stuff. i need to re-vamp the type design on the back anyways, according to my intructor. i'll post the final versions once i get them all nice and prim and A+ material. |
|
|
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 | Posts: 698 | Location: Chicago
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:34 pm
Saellys wrote: noodleman wrote: the igonorance motif wrote: welp, finished the back part of the eisley CD. again, thanks for the comments yall.
ONLY 8 TRACKS!?? No no no no no. Albums must be at least 12, if not 15 tracks. Starflyer 59's Talking Vocie vs. Singing Voice has only 9 tracks. And they call it an album. It's amazing music but that's plain WRONG. nathan. Technically the line between EP and album is 7 tracks. Sigur Ros' ( ) has eight tracks, several of which are rather lengthy, and it seems to me that fits the bill for a full album. Nevertheless, I fully agree that any Eisley album must have no less than 10 and preferably 12 or more. Speaking of that, I hope Eisley tracks are a bit more diversified on the second LP length wise. I believe every track on Room Noises was between 3 and 4 minutes long. Not saying its always a bad thing, but every song doesn't need to be cut like a single. It seems like the label/producers were expecting for Eisley to be big on the radio. Things are funny like that, Damien Rice's debut album is pretty much unmarketable on the radio. It has lots of huge tempo and volume changes, and really no songs short enough for the radio. Room Noises, on the other hand, contained songs that were all very timely and stayed at a pretty consistant volume. Yet, O went platinum 3 times over. The music business is funny. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:29 pm
you people are hilarious ... and you're making me want to become increasingly creative .. stop that .. thx . :p _________________ Eisley makes me happy ... yup ... myspace 
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 | Posts: 54 | Location: Issaquah, WA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:39 pm
DRMS_7888 wrote: Speaking of that, I hope Eisley tracks are a bit more diversified on the second LP length wise. I believe every track on Room Noises was between 3 and 4 minutes long. Not saying its always a bad thing, but every song doesn't need to be cut like a single. It seems like the label/producers were expecting for Eisley to be big on the radio. I think it has been said that the length thing just happened that way. But I might be wrong. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25184 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:57 am
TheAntrider wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: Speaking of that, I hope Eisley tracks are a bit more diversified on the second LP length wise. I believe every track on Room Noises was between 3 and 4 minutes long. Not saying its always a bad thing, but every song doesn't need to be cut like a single. It seems like the label/producers were expecting for Eisley to be big on the radio. I think it has been said that the length thing just happened that way. But I might be wrong. Gah. Why do you always think you know everything? _________________ Gosh, writings music Ryan5 wrote: I still love Eisley a gamahucheing million time better than farting |
|
|
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 | Posts: 2060 | Location: Dallas, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:19 am
The5thavocado wrote: TheAntrider wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: Speaking of that, I hope Eisley tracks are a bit more diversified on the second LP length wise. I believe every track on Room Noises was between 3 and 4 minutes long. Not saying its always a bad thing, but every song doesn't need to be cut like a single. It seems like the label/producers were expecting for Eisley to be big on the radio. I think it has been said that the length thing just happened that way. But I might be wrong. Gah. Why do you always think you know everything? I'm a journalist. I dislike the lack of stating things as having been said without actual proof sitting in front of me. You'll also note I use a lot of attribution. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25184 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 28 Feb 2005 | Posts: 2060 | Location: Dallas, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:15 am
oosker wrote: HAHAHA i loveee this! _________________ 
|
|
|
Joined: 12 May 2006 | Posts: 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> eisley album cover concept
Page 3 of 4 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
