|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:09 am 
For the sake of argument Katherine is a flower as is Jasmine, each have been popular. I'm related to two flowers myself. At the school I work at I enter the names of all student & staff into our servers & databases. Off the cuff here are ones that are common feminine across both groups (spellings vary): Lilly, sierra, grace, abby, jade(n), elizabeth, hannah, kathy, mia, chris (tin) a,e, cheyenne, faiith, jordan, britney, kelsey, taylor With boys trendy ones are austin, braden, hunter, tristan, chase, mason and biblical ones like elijah, jeremiah, and isaiah. There still a ton of stevens, matthews, michaels, aarons, adams, joshuas, and less johns or jameses(all biblical as well, I know I know). There are more nathans than i'd expect. _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB           
 = personal fave  = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
Last edited by wilsmith on Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
   |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:16 am
I think Scarlett Marie King would be pretty. _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
|
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
|
  |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:29 pm
wilsmith wrote: I'm related to two flowers myself. _________________ Albert Camus wrote: Always go too far, because that's where you'll find the truth. |
|
|
Joined: 04 May 2007 | Posts: 3862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:48 pm
wilsmith wrote: For the sake of argument Katherine is a flower as is Jasmine, each have been popular. I'm related to two flowers myself. When I think of the name Jasmine the only thing that comes to mind is my cat Jasmine that I named after a Disney princess when I was about 4. 
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:03 pm
Your cat had a lovely name, the same as one of my nieces, who's one of the sweetest soul's I've known.
Lillian always strikes me, I've been smitten with that name since I was like 10 years old. Never knew anyone by that name then, but it just sounds beautiful to me. Also, Dawn is a nice middle name, but Scarlett Dawn makes me think of Red Dawn, the movie that introduced me to patrick swayze, c thomas howell, jennifer grey & others. They"re remaking it and I wouldn't burden a kid with a ready made joke about their name. I'm sure that comes as no surprise... _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB
= personal fave = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:47 pm
Does anyone know when she's due? I saw her 9 mos. picture and was like WOAH I thought she just announced her pregnancy |
|
|
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 | Posts: 803 | Location: wherever
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:30 pm
She was 4 months when they announced right? That was in may? Gonna be one heckuva xmas! _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB
= personal fave = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
Last edited by wilsmith on Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:36 pm
prolly within the next few months or so _________________ 
we're really not alone, we have each other |
|
|
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 | Posts: 2600 | Location: sitting in his nowhere land, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:28 pm
Nowhere Man wrote: prolly within the next few months or so Stacy is already at 36 weeks. http://instagram.com/p/Qa5DvtojQB/ |
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:38 pm
Yeah, by my non-math, she's due now, and the 2nd wave (the d'agostinos', the Best Duprees') will be here in time for Christmas, and then the Bemis's are expecting around Valentine's right? _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB
= personal fave = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:25 pm
wilsmith wrote: Yeah, by my non-math, she's due now Pregnancy lasts 40 weeks, ideally. _________________ INTELLECT AND ROMANCE OVER BRUTE FORCE AND CYNICISM Smokemonster |
|
|
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 | Posts: 14510 | Location: Alone on an airplane, fallin' asleep against the windowpane...
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:11 am
By now, I should have said "sometime this month". But you know, imprecise words and imprecise math should always go together, so I'm reppin' consistency at least
They should count pregnancy durations in days, since they are more mathematically consistent to count, as opposed to weeks and months which don't conform. I'm all for a range of days, like 275-280 for example in the ideal term. Does that jibe? _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB
= personal fave = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:51 am
wilsmith wrote: They should count pregnancy durations in days, since they are more mathematically consistent to count, as opposed to weeks and months which don't conform. I'm all for a range of days, like 275-280 for example in the ideal term. Does that jibe? I mean, weeks are always in groups of seven. That's not inconsistent. Once you starting getting into high, triple digit numbers I feel like it's harder to mentally swallow how long that is, exactly, given that it's pretty irregular to number days singly when they're large enough to be split into the larger units of weeks and months. besides, that's a little toooo precise. Babies don't pay attention to doctors' estimates. I was born three weeks early! If you have x number of days it feels a little less ballpark-y. |
|
|
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 | Posts: 803 | Location: wherever
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:13 pm
vintage_snowflake wrote: wilsmith wrote: They should count pregnancy durations in days, since they are more mathematically consistent to count, as opposed to weeks and months which don't conform. I'm all for a range of days, like 275-280 for example in the ideal term. Does that jibe? I mean, weeks are always in groups of seven. That's not inconsistent. Once you starting getting into high, triple digit numbers I feel like it's harder to mentally swallow how long that is, exactly, given that it's pretty irregular to number days singly when they're large enough to be split into the larger units of weeks and months. besides, that's a little toooo precise. Babies don't pay attention to doctors' estimates. I was born three weeks early! If you have x number of days it feels a little less ballpark-y. This. Let's not make pregnancy feel even longer, please. _________________ INTELLECT AND ROMANCE OVER BRUTE FORCE AND CYNICISM Smokemonster |
|
|
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 | Posts: 14510 | Location: Alone on an airplane, fallin' asleep against the windowpane...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:29 pm
Well, I don't have a womb, so you all have a trump card in this one. I'm just saying, the thing about weeks is, there are seven days, so when you expect a child to be born, ideally in 40 weeks, well that is still a span of of 7 days. When you talk about a pregnancy being 9 months, well, months are inconsistent in the number of days they contain. So what do Doctor's do, they give a Due Date, or in other words, they count up a number of days that span weeks and months. But only Doctors have permission to count days and think in terms of days, while we are stuck with months and weeks, ranges that are atypical to how we normally do math (counting in 7s, using a variable that represents a range of numbers and not just a set value). I'm being a man right now. That's all. If days are good enough for Doctors, why not the rest of us? That's all I'm saying. It's not like people don't X out days on the calender leading up till the Due Date anyway? If you have read this far, thank you for your graciousness and generosity. May you be blessed! _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB
= personal fave = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Stacy and Darren are having a baby!
Page 4 of 7 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
