| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:53 am 
seansy wrote: I want to hear Chauntelle's songs  .i fix ...see? she should do more than one. _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
|
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
|
    |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:38 pm
Music_Lover wrote: seansy wrote: I want to hear Chauntelle's songs .i fix ...see? she should do more than one. heh heh - one note at a time, people.  _________________ http://www.twitter.com/drstrangeblog http://www.last.fm/user/getinline I can't find the time to write my mind the way I want it to read. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Mar 2008 | Posts: 2003 | Location: Iowa
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:40 pm
patrock wrote: bigideas wrote: I was really surprised when I watched those Kansas live videos because I heard more of Stacy's playing. Well it was plugged into the sound board. It didn't sound like that, actually. so they took the sound directly from the mixer as well? did they record the entire show? they really should do something with this - if not commercially, at least put it out there for free...why let it waste away in some "vault?" in regards to the 10 minute song comment: that is kinda what i was thinking of a multi-part song like Paranoid Android/Bohemian Rhapsody/Happiness is a Warm Gun. one where they all play guitar at one point and switch instruments, etc., where you take multiple songs/bits and put them together. sometimes you can go overboard - i think The Decemberists (colin meloy) did on the last album - and Stephen Malkmus, as much as i like Real Emotional Trash, i don't always want to listen to that many long songs in a row. weird thing about long songs - when the best songs of the year lists come out you'll usually see these on those lists. they might not even be the best songs on that album, i guess the length just makes people remember the songs more? people who aren't songwriters probably think "wow, how did they write a song like that?" when in actuality they could have just put song fragments together (like side 2 of Abbey Road). _________________ I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Nov 2002 | Posts: 6826 | Location: Gilmer, Tejas
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:03 pm
bigideas wrote: patrock wrote: bigideas wrote: I was really surprised when I watched those Kansas live videos because I heard more of Stacy's playing. Well it was plugged into the sound board. It didn't sound like that, actually. so they took the sound directly from the mixer as well? did they record the entire show? I guess? I'd assume it was plugged into all that jazz. They stopped recording sometime after Come Clean. Certainly not the whole show. |
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:26 am
grain thrower wrote: Music_Lover wrote: seansy wrote: I want to hear Chauntelle's songs .i fix ...see? she should do more than one. heh heh - one note at a time, people. oh, i know. i was just teasing. I'm just wishing that she'll do the main vocals. if only for one song. i'm guessing they're gonna try but i think Eisley could really wow us with another powerhouse kick in the ears by doing so.
i'll be greatful for any new music, though. _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
|
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:35 am
Music_Lover wrote: seansy wrote: I want to hear Chauntelle's songs .i fix ...see? she should do more than one. Touche, Good call. _________________ And you run and you run to catch up with the sun, but it's sinking And racing around to come up behind you again The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older Shorter of breath and one day closer to death |
|
|
Joined: 29 May 2008 | Posts: 270 | Location: Levittown, NY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:18 am
Music_Lover wrote: grain thrower wrote: Music_Lover wrote: seansy wrote: I want to hear Chauntelle's songs .i fix ...see? she should do more than one. heh heh - one note at a time, people. oh, i know. i was just teasing. I'm just wishing that she'll do the main vocals. if only for one song. i'm guessing they're gonna try but i think Eisley could really wow us with another powerhouse kick in the ears by doing so.
absolutely agree with that!  _________________ http://www.twitter.com/drstrangeblog http://www.last.fm/user/getinline I can't find the time to write my mind the way I want it to read. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Mar 2008 | Posts: 2003 | Location: Iowa
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:46 am
well, i always preferred Eisley's “heavier” side! i mean, when i first got into Eisley (whenever that was) the first song i heard was Head Against The Sky, and that's what i thought all their songs sounded like! i do love their quieter side, too (well, most of the time!), but if the next album is going to have more songs like, say, Many Funerals, and less songs like, oh, Come Clean, then i'll be very happy! or, how about just more songs? i still think it's wierd that you could probably fit both of their albums on one CD! |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:00 am
do not be afraid. wrote: well, i always preferred Eisley's “heavier” side! i mean, when i first got into Eisley (whenever that was) the first song i heard was Head Against The Sky, and that's what i thought all their songs sounded like! i do love their quieter side, too (well, most of the time!), but if the next album is going to have more songs like, say, Many Funerals, and less songs like, oh, Come Clean, then i'll be very happy! or, how about just more songs? i still think it's wierd that you could probably fit both of their albums on one CD! I just checked, the total runtime between both albums is 80 minutes, that's pretty much the exact amount of CD quality audio a CD can hold. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:02 am
do not be afraid. wrote: i still think it's wierd that you could probably fit both of their albums on one CD! what is weird about that? an album in the 35-45 min range is the best. much longer than that seems too much at a time, and less than that seems a rip off. offhand, anyone know how long Combinations would have been if they included Marsh and Actors? _________________ I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Nov 2002 | Posts: 6826 | Location: Gilmer, Tejas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:08 am
42 minutes with, 35 minutes without. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:17 am
bigideas wrote: do not be afraid. wrote: i still think it's wierd that you could probably fit both of their albums on one CD! what is weird about that? an album in the 35-45 min range is the best. much longer than that seems too much at a time, and less than that seems a rip off. well, “wierd” might be the wrong word… i don't know… it's just than when an album runs much under 60 minutes, or so, i almost always feel like it's too short! like, uh, where's the rest of the album? but, i may very well be completely alone on that one… |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:15 pm
do not be afraid. wrote: bigideas wrote: do not be afraid. wrote: i still think it's wierd that you could probably fit both of their albums on one CD! what is weird about that? an album in the 35-45 min range is the best. much longer than that seems too much at a time, and less than that seems a rip off. well, “wierd” might be the wrong word… i don't know… it's just than when an album runs much under 60 minutes, or so, i almost always feel like it's too short! like, uh, where's the rest of the album? but, i may very well be completely alone on that one… _________________ Kulvir. |
|
|
Joined: 10 Mar 2005 | Posts: 1844 | Location: Vancouver, BC
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:49 pm
I also agree with the 35 min. to 45 min. range as being optimal for a CD! Much longer than that and it looses it's focus  _________________ Mike=] |
|
|
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 | Posts: 1453 | Location: Orlando, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:25 pm
kulvir wrote: I don't think I need a certain number of minutes to make an album feel complete. It's more about the number of songs and I think 11 or 12 songs is usually perfect. The Pixies never made an album over 40 mins and they made some of my favorite albums. mikep0922 wrote: I also agree with the 35 min. to 45 min. range as being optimal for a CD! Much longer than that and it looses it's focus humbug! listening to a truly great album is like a journey into another world, and i don't want a “focused” journey — stopping off at all the major sights and getting the hell out — i want to spread out, explore, get lost, in that world, and that's why i love long albums! heck, even if Eisley's next album is 24 hours long, i'll be more than happy to spend all 24 hours getting lost in it! of course, again, i might be the only one… |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
