|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Author | Message | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Post subject: Elena Kagen: The Sporty Supreme Court Justice?Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 10:53 pm 
I'm pretty sure we had a thread on Sotomayor. Why are we slacking on Kagen? _________________ 
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 | Posts: 995 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 1:08 am
The ole' softball = lesbian trick _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 7:13 am
I don't know a thing about this woman. I will refrain from forming an opinion. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 13 Apr 2007 | Posts: 1374 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 6:04 pm
She looks like a dude. 
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 | Posts: 1547 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:47 am
Read her senior thesis from Princeton now, before it is taken down again (it's been taken down everywhere it has been posted)... Or if you don't have time to read the whole thing, read the last 2 pages. http://infidelsarecool.com/elena-kagan-thesis.pdf As for the poll, her playing softball would have no effect on her being qualified or not qualified for the court. Absurd question, really. Who hasn't played softball? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Re: Elena Kagen: The Sporty Supreme Court Justice? Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:04 am
gundamit wrote:
Why are we slacking on Kagen? That's a shot from a pickup game, look at her get-up, if I don't see her in a uni the stereotype doesn't stick. _________________ yup, that's my name. FOR YOUR RATING PLEASURE: 4 LIKE Buttons, 1 NEUTRAL, 1 VEXED, 5 DISLIKE buttons. LC > FB           
 = personal fave  = Eisley fans should dig it
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 | Posts: 9641 | Location: Greater St. Louis Area
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:07 am
DRMS_7888 wrote: The ole' softball = lesbian trick as long as she doesn't make a Christian Folk Album we will be ok. _________________ Wil's excellent description of me. wilsmith wrote: You're the Anti-Censorship+Topless Twitpic Parodying+Youth Group Video Directing guy that's a champion for the 1st amendment, Videogames as Art, and unrepentant file sharing... Instagram - Facebook - Twitter - YouTube |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 | Posts: 4836 | Location: illinois
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:37 am
CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: Read her senior thesis from Princeton now, before it is taken down again (it's been taken down everywhere it has been posted)...
Or if you don't have time to read the whole thing, read the last 2 pages. http://infidelsarecool.com/elena-kagan-thesis.pdf What are you implying? Also, that's a long ass thesis (130 pages) for a Bachelor's degree. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:08 am
DRMS_7888 wrote: What are you implying? I didn't imply anything. DRMS_7888 wrote: Also, that's a long ass thesis (130 pages) for a Bachelor's degree. What are you implying? -- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:58 am
CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: Also, that's a long ass thesis (130 pages) for a Bachelor's degree. What are you implying? -- Princeton has high academic standards? _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:09 am
DRMS_7888 wrote: CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: Also, that's a long ass thesis (130 pages) for a Bachelor's degree. What are you implying? -- Princeton has high academic standards? That is a given, isn't it? Acceptance rate of 10%. 97% of those admitted were in the Top 10% of their high school class. Appears they have high academic standards. As you have not taken my bait, I will not take yours...  Because we're just playing semantics games here, right? Clearly both of our questions were rhetorical, right? (consider this recasting my line, of course the hook is more obvious this time.. Anyone with with any fishing knowledge knows when fishing with sinking lines, you will need to recast your line throughout the day...).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 2:31 pm
I'm just surprised you didn't play the 'lack of judicial experience' card. I mean, did you know that Obama had zero executive experience before becoming President? _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 4:48 am
DRMS_7888 wrote: I'm just surprised you didn't play the 'lack of judicial experience' card. I mean, did you know that Obama had zero executive experience before becoming President? I made that point (about Obama) over and over again in 2008. Nobody listens! As for Kagen, it is probably an asset and not a liability that she hasn't been a judge. Who knows, maybe the left will get a surprise. Six currently on the Supreme Court were appointed by Republican presidents, clearly a couple surprises in there. You can't always know for certain how someone will be once they get on the Supreme Court, even less so someone who has never been a judge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 5:55 am
CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: I'm just surprised you didn't play the 'lack of judicial experience' card. I mean, did you know that Obama had zero executive experience before becoming President? I made that point (about Obama) over and over again in 2008. Nobody listens! As for Kagen, it is probably an asset and not a liability that she hasn't been a judge. Who knows, maybe the left will get a surprise. Six currently on the Supreme Court were appointed by Republican presidents, clearly a couple surprises in there. You can't always know for certain how someone will be once they get on the Supreme Court, even less so someone who has never been a judge.Yeah, I agree. It worked out for Thurgood Marshall and William Rehnquist. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 8:13 am
from a brief on the supreme court case US government vs Stevens, she is quoted as saying this..... “Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs.” You guys need to read up on this lady. She's kinda scary. This is far from the first quote she has made like this, but this one illustrates her feelings on the first amendment well. I'm not sure we want someone who feels this way about the first amendment in the supreme court. Supressing free speech is a can of worms I don't think we want to open up. _________________ 
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 | Posts: 259 | Location: athens, grand prairie, denton.... im a nomad
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
goto page | next >>
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
