Author | Message |
---|---|
I don't know if anyone has already made a thread like this one, but is Chauntelle really dating the guy who made her and Sherri's new guitars/ It's on her wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chauntelle_DuPree The end of the first paragraph... _________________ Kneel before your god Babylon! "I don't wanna touch you and feel so helpless; I don't wanna smell you and lose my senses" Rufus Wainwright, Foolish Love |
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 | Posts: 807 | Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
|
|
Well the band don't normally like to have their personal lives discussed on the board. So if there is any truth to the statement and Chauntelle would like to I am sure she will share it in her journal. It is good to bring this to attention though so hopefully if it is not true someone from the family can take care of it. _________________ "I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I cover no man's soul, nor is my soul theirs to cover."? "My happiness is not the means to any end. It is the end." -Ayn Rand, Anthem |
|
Joined: 28 Feb 2004 | Posts: 722 | Location: Jamestown, NY
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 | Posts: 2890 | Location: Oregon
|
|
uncreative wrote: I don't trust Wikipedia.
Although I use it a lot. Go figure. I wouldn't trust Eisley wikipedia, but a busier wiki page is normally about 99% accurate most of the time. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
DRMS_7888 wrote: uncreative wrote: I don't trust Wikipedia.
Although I use it a lot. Go figure. I wouldn't trust Eisley wikipedia, but a busier wiki page is normally about 99% accurate most of the time. This i agree with 100 percent. For smaller less known articles true it can be wrong sometimes. But for important popular subjects, Wiki is just about always correct. _________________ And you run and you run to catch up with the sun, but it's sinking And racing around to come up behind you again The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older Shorter of breath and one day closer to death |
|
Joined: 29 May 2008 | Posts: 270 | Location: Levittown, NY
|
|
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 | Posts: 254 | Location: New York
|
|
DRMS_7888 wrote: uncreative wrote: I don't trust Wikipedia.
Although I use it a lot. Go figure. I wouldn't trust Eisley wikipedia, but a busier wiki page is normally about 99% accurate most of the time. i once typed in the word protagonist and the entire page described antagonists. i was just glad i knew the real definition or else i would've believed the page. but i still use wikipedia heavily when writing papers..i just don't put it in the bibliography. |
|
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 | Posts: 1963 |
|
|
Wikipedia is great because it gives you quality sources and translates them into plain English. You should never use Wikipedia as an actual source, use it for finding sources fast. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
DRMS_7888 wrote: uncreative wrote: I don't trust Wikipedia.
Although I use it a lot. Go figure. I wouldn't trust Eisley wikipedia, but a busier wiki page is normally about 99% accurate most of the time. From dictionary.com (a site I do trust ) trust: 1. reliance on the integrity, strength, ability, surety, etc., of a person or thing; confidence. So basically, I don't rely on the information. If I really want/need to know the facts about something, I'll check Wikipedia, but then verify that information with a different source because I don't trust it! Haha. However, most of the things I look up on Wikipedia aren't terribly important so even if it's false I'm not going to worry about verifying it because I know chances are it's true. So, I don't trust it but I still believe it, if that makes any sense. (I hope I don't start getting compared to "do not be afraid" because of the use of multiple italics, haha. Not that there's anything wrong with him. (And yes, that is an intentional Seinfeld reference)) |
|
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 | Posts: 2890 | Location: Oregon
|
|
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 | Posts: 1313 |
|
|
crazeemunkeyz wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: uncreative wrote: I don't trust Wikipedia.
Although I use it a lot. Go figure. I wouldn't trust Eisley wikipedia, but a busier wiki page is normally about 99% accurate most of the time. i once typed in the word protagonist and the entire page described antagonists. i was just glad i knew the real definition or else i would've believed the page. but i still use wikipedia heavily when writing papers..i just don't put it in the bibliography. haha i do the same thing.. then i use wikipedia's bibliography as mine. aaand, i wouldn't really trust anything i read on wikipedia when it's about a muscian, or actor. _________________ I used to be Snow White but I drifted -Mae West |
|
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 | Posts: 666 | Location: Maryland
|
|
Quote: I hope I don't start getting compared to "do not be afraid" because of the use of multiple italics, haha. Not that there's anything wrong with him. (And yes, that is an intentional Seinfeld reference)) Need to throw some exclamation marks in. _________________ Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth. Oscar Wilde |
|
Joined: 01 Jun 2008 | Posts: 836 |
|
|
Cendrillon wrote: Quote: I hope I don't start getting compared to "do not be afraid" because of the use of multiple italics, haha. Not that there's anything wrong with him. (And yes, that is an intentional Seinfeld reference)) Need to throw some exclamation marks in. Quote: From dictionary.com (a site I do trust! )
trust: 1. reliance on the integrity, strength, ability, surety, etc., of a person or thing; confidence. So basically, I don't rely on the information! If I really want/need to know the facts about something, I'll check Wikipedia, but then verify that information with a different source because I don't trust it! Haha. However, most of the things I look up on Wikipedia aren't terribly important so even if it's false I'm not going to worry about verifying it because I know chances are it's true! So, I don't trust it but I still believe it, if that makes any sense. How was that? Haha. Message to do not be afraid: I'm not poking fun at you in a negative manner. I respect all your opinions, and actually really enjoy your enthusiastic posts. I'm just having a little fun. I hope you will just laugh at me. |
|
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 | Posts: 2890 | Location: Oregon
|
|
patrock wrote: It might be this "Mrpine" person who edited her page many times............I think it might be this "Mrpine" after all. Checking the revisions made and all. in case anyone is wondering (i am not saying you are) that Mrpine is not me. I read wikipedia but do not update it. and my user name is not Mrpine _________________ Wil's excellent description of me. wilsmith wrote: You're the Anti-Censorship+Topless Twitpic Parodying+Youth Group Video Directing guy that's a champion for the 1st amendment, Videogames as Art, and unrepentant file sharing... Instagram - Facebook - Twitter - YouTube |
|
Joined: 09 Aug 2004 | Posts: 4836 | Location: illinois
|
|
|
|
goto page | next >>
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|