
|
goto page | next >>
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Is the new picture section working for anyone else on the new site. It doesn't seem to be working. When I click the little thumbnail things, it's just a link to the same page as the thumbnails are on. And it takes forever to load (it says it has to load like 80 things.) |
|
|
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 | Posts: 44 |
|
|
|
It might take a while to load right now, but Boyd said that things should start to speed up a bit as more things get ironed out on the new site. As for the pictures, just hover over the thumbnails with your cursor until the large versions appear to the left. |
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 |
|
|
|
Joined: 30 Nov 2003 | Posts: 3787 |
|
|
|
The Spark wrote: Is the new picture section working for anyone else on the new site. It doesn't seem to be working. When I click the little thumbnail things, it's just a link to the same page as the thumbnails are on. And it takes forever to load (it says it has to load like 80 things.) The thumbnails are rollovers; there's no clicking necessary. Is your browser and computer up to date? _________________ INTELLECT AND ROMANCE OVER BRUTE FORCE AND CYNICISM Smokemonster |
|
|
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 | Posts: 14510 | Location: Alone on an airplane, fallin' asleep against the windowpane...
|
|
|
Yeah, it requires javascript to be enabled, and unfortunately it currently preloads the fullsize photos. That's 32 images to load per photo page. We're working on a better solution. _________________ "The revolution starts today, not tomorrow." :: got g-Love? |
|
|
Joined: 02 Nov 2002 | Posts: 4224 | Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 |
|
|
|
An up to date browser and a decent connection should be fine with that site. If you are dialup, you might need to wait a while. The page has to load all the pictures first. Boyd did that so the pictures would be higher quality. Sacrificed speed for quality. Not bad if you have a decent connection, I don't think. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2004 | Posts: 1082 | Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
Joined: 03 Oct 2003 | Posts: 1428 | Location: mpls, mn
|
|
|
Joined: 06 Mar 2004 | Posts: 1346 | Location: Maryland
|
|
|
ladiosadice wrote: The pictures work for me and are amazing. Simply amazing. Except those first three really suck. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 | Posts: 1574 | Location: Norcal
|
|
|
TheAntrider wrote: ladiosadice wrote: The pictures work for me and are amazing. Simply amazing. Except those first three really suck. yeah, I agree they must have been taken by a blind man... Stevie Wonder could have taken better shots _________________
Visit my Pic Album! |
|
|
Joined: 17 Jul 2003 | Posts: 3973 | Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Jan 2005 | Posts: 44 |
|
|
|
Vegetable wrote: TheAntrider wrote: ladiosadice wrote: The pictures work for me and are amazing. Simply amazing. Except those first three really suck. yeah, I agree they must have been taken by a blind man... Stevie Wonder could have taken better shots Stevie Wonder only photographs tennis matches. _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Pics on the new site
Page 1 of 2 goto page | next >>
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|


