|
<< prev | goto page
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:20 pm 
thealbumleaf wrote: Yeah, I think old Eisley is so much better. A long time ago I could identify with their lyrics... now they sing about finding trolleys and not being able to find them again. Sorry but that does nothing for me. I can relate more to Eisley now that they sing about Trolley's and such.. but anyhow, what i was actually going to say is that i absolutely adore the album leaf, and i'm very happy they are your screenname. |
|
|
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 | Posts: 2130 | Location: varies.
|
|
  |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:25 pm
To a previous post: So a band is better because you can relate to them? Isn't that just a personal preference and not actually an expression of their ability to make music? To say any band is better or worse because of your ability to relate to them is a fallacy. Not everyone is the same, it would be better for you, but not for everyone. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
   |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 5:44 pm
Wow. You guys get pretty defensive. I was just sharing my opinion...I think it's great that you guys can relate with stuff like trolleys and humming meadows. Unfortunately I can't. And that doesn't mean I don't love Eisley, because I do. I'm just saying the older stuff was better. Glad you like the album leaf loveisachemical. _________________ I jumped in the river and what did I see Black-eyed angels swam with me |
|
|
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 | Posts: 4 | Location: Greenville, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:03 pm
thealbumleaf wrote: Wow. You guys get pretty defensive. I was just sharing my opinion...I think it's great that you guys can relate with stuff like trolleys and humming meadows. Unfortunately I can't. And that doesn't mean I don't love Eisley, because I do. I'm just saying the older stuff was better. Glad you like the album leaf loveisachemical. I wouldnt' call it defensive, I was just pointing out something. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 7:01 pm
that does make sense antrider!!. gotter to respect the elders of this forum.. they are wise and really know everything about eisley , from back to front. i respect you guys. * bows down* _________________ http://its-kitsch.deviantart.com/ |
|
|
Joined: 22 Jan 2005 | Posts: 2278 | Location: sweet sydney,australia
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> New Eisley Vs. Old
Page 3 of 3 << prev | goto page
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
