Laughing City
Author Message
Veem
Sea Post King


No matter what producer you use, make sure he/she knows a thing or two about dynamic contrast.

http://www.airwindows.com/analysis/Albums/index.html

Everything these days is way too loud and in your face. Everything is compressed to all hell. Even acoustic oriented stuff is mastered and engineered to the point of being taxing on the ears (Beck - Seachange is guilty of it. The music may be nice, but the production and mastering isn't dynamic in volume and therefore everything sounds kind of the same)

Older music is not as loud. That's why on the back of Exile on Main Street it says PLAY IT LOUD. Dark Side of the Moon is the most dynamic stuff also.


To put it simply, tell the record label hellhounds that you want things quieter to leave room for the instruments to exist. A good producer understands this and will agree with you. It's the executives you'll need to sway. Since everything on the radio is trying to be louder than the next thing, all they care about is making that impact on the radio.

Timeless music always makes a bigger impact than louder music.
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 | Posts: 15 | Location: Outer Space
View user's profile Send private message
GlassUser
Sea Post King


most CDs are mastered by someone who has no idea what they're doing. The volume is way off optimal so it doesn't sound too soft, because people turn their volume down because other mass produced dreck is also mastered too loud. Sigh.
_________________
God is a place you will wait for the rest of your life
Joined: 26 Dec 2002 | Posts: 407 | Location: Houston, Texas
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Veem
Sea Post King


It seems like the trend lately is to make everything sound as loud and full as possible no matter what volume the consumer is listening at. They've gotten pretty good at it.

The people that produced and mastered Michelle Branch's music seemed to have become gods at this (I mean, EVERYTHING IS SO LOUD ALL THE TIME).

The problem is, this is stupid. There's no point. Everyone knows how to work the volume. And all radio stations are equipped to make things as loud as everything else with their own compressors and stuff.

Double sigh.
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 | Posts: 15 | Location: Outer Space
View user's profile Send private message
bgburroughs
Vintage Newbie


Great points, Veem! I'm sure that their producer will be fully aware of this (judging from his work with Elliott Smith), and I'm sure that Eisley will be sure not to compromise the timeless nature of their music.
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 | 
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
theenvycorps
Vintage Newbie


My band just had our album mastered, and we were adamant about keeping the dynamics intact. The mastering engineer was great and a complete pro (Doug Van Sloun, who's done Bright Eyes, Cursive and others), and he showed us some graphs similar to those from records that are out now.

Linkin Park and Norah Jones were horrible, no dynamics whatsoever, just as loud as fricking possible. Rarely did they fluctuate more that 6db....it was crazy.

Knowing Elliot Smith's records I'm sure Eisley will be fine.

Great topic, Veem.
Joined: 20 Aug 2003 | Posts: 2261 | Location: Ames, Iowa
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Veem
Sea Post King


wow, I'm surprised about norah jones. Even though I haven't sat down to listen to any of her stuff with headphones, i figured it'd have the qualities of older productions at the very least.
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 | Posts: 15 | Location: Outer Space
View user's profile Send private message
theenvycorps
Vintage Newbie


If you listen closely, it's so loud that the cd actually distorts when she belts out with her voice.

It was a very interesting experience, and I am really starting to appreciate older analog recording techniques.
Joined: 20 Aug 2003 | Posts: 2261 | Location: Ames, Iowa
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
ali
since 1979


very cool topic, indeed. four stars!

i remember reading someone ranting about this not too long ago, somewhere else. would someone mind going into the technical details a little? i'm just curious..

_________________
hello.
Joined: 23 Aug 2003 | Posts: 5978 | Location: Austin, Texas
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
GlassUser
Sea Post King


theenvycorps wrote:
If you listen closely, it's so loud that the cd actually distorts when she belts out with her voice.

Yep, exactly why it's bad. You max the upper range to the point of clipping and leave nearly the bottom half unused. Quite annoying.

_________________
God is a place you will wait for the rest of your life
Joined: 26 Dec 2002 | Posts: 407 | Location: Houston, Texas
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Veem
Sea Post King


Even OK Computer is loud. I love the album but the loudness annoys me.
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 | Posts: 15 | Location: Outer Space
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew
Lost at Forum


You have to realize that loud is diffrent from full. A full sound is great if treated correctly the right dynamics is a key as well. Dynamics give the song emotion and allow you to draw the listener tward the climax of the song. Im also not opposed to the loud sound the "wall of sound" has been around for decades but now there using digital to do it which I belive is horrid. The warmth of analog will never be reproduced by digital, what producers need to realize is that true musical sound cannot be put into 1's and 0's and sound good.
Joined: 05 Nov 2002 | Posts: 1479 | Location: Dallas, Texas
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
bgburroughs
Vintage Newbie


Andrew wrote:
You have to realize that loud is diffrent from full. A full sound is great if treated correctly the right dynamics is a key as well. Dynamics give the song emotion and allow you to draw the listener tward the climax of the song. Im also not opposed to the loud sound the "wall of sound" has been around for decades but now there using digital to do it which I belive is horrid. The warmth of analog will never be reproduced by digital, what producers need to realize is that true musical sound cannot be put into 1's and 0's and sound good.


I think that what everyone here is referring to is when every element is so loud as to make the recording harsh in parts and just muddy overall. I agree with you completely about "full" sounding recordings--I'm all for that. It's just a different matter when everything is cranked up together so much that everything lacks definition and dynamics.
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 | 
Last edited by bgburroughs on Thu Dec 04, 2003 3:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Veem
Sea Post King


I know the difference between loud and full. I'm not talking about that. The distinction is there to be made, but full is another conversation. There's really nothing wrong with full because it's, well, an effect. Loud is a simple concept.

I'm not for certain that digital is the culprit also. It's just that all these trends have become the standard as digital became more prominent.

Analog equipment is cooler to work with though.
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 | Posts: 15 | Location: Outer Space
View user's profile Send private message
bgburroughs
Vintage Newbie


I forgot to mention My Bloody Valentine's Loveless... I think it's one of the very few albums that can really pull off the loudness, because that's the whole essence of the music. And even at that, the sound is never harsh, and the beautiful melodies always poke through the wall of sound.
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 | 
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Veem
Sea Post King


I guess I should have been more detailed about OK Computer...

I mean it's on average just loud. It's dynamic, but listening to it back to back with Pink Floyd (as I've done many times), its volume is noticeable.
Joined: 28 Nov 2003 | Posts: 15 | Location: Outer Space
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic

Display posts from previous:   



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB, coffee, and Eisley fans worldwide.
phpBB is © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group