|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Author | Message | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:41 am 
madsenfan35 wrote: Room Noises < Laughing City EP < EP 1
I definitely prefer the Laughing City EP version of "Telescope Eyes" over the Room Noises version. I wholly agree. _________________ --Lin-- If I had something clever to say... Audioscrobbler lies the overcast |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 | Posts: 61 | Location: an urban suburb no one's written a hit single about
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
    |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 9:32 am
No dobut the laughing city version is far superior. Less production, more raw energy and talent allowed to creatively flow through. However, I see why the major label wanted to get rid of specific names (Michael), and other extra sensitive items ...let your short legs carry you away...you freak... |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:47 am
CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: No dobut the laughing city version is far superior. Less production, more raw energy and talent allowed to creatively flow through. However, I see why the major label wanted to get rid of specific names (Michael), and other extra sensitive items ...let your short legs carry you away...you freak... i thought it was matthew? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 10 Nov 2005 | Posts: 1692 | Location: orange county, ca
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 2:58 pm
nevernever wrote: CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: No dobut the laughing city version is far superior. Less production, more raw energy and talent allowed to creatively flow through. However, I see why the major label wanted to get rid of specific names (Michael), and other extra sensitive items ...let your short legs carry you away...you freak... i thought it was matthew? Yeah, it was Matthew. "Dear Matthew, why can't you see?" Maybe they got confused with Michael's Song? _________________ - Jessica ------------------------------------------------------- "So many bands are like painters standing in front of their paintings going, 'Look at me, I did this.' It's like, 'Get out the way, I can't see it.'" - Dougie Payne, bassist of Travis ================================ http://www.xanga.com/madsenfan35 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 09 Feb 2004 | Posts: 544 | Location: Silverlake, Los Angeles, CA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 5:20 pm
jdstories wrote: Echo wrote: DRMS_7888 wrote: I vote for the independent EP version which can be found here, www.orangegoldandgreen.com Agree! It was the first Eisley song I heard and I fell in love with them!  The "Marvelous Things video" is what made me fall in love with Eisley. JD I've watched that video so many time. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 23 May 2005 | Posts: 3859 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:24 pm
I'm pretty sure voting for the LC version is the trendy thing to do. Yes it has "less production" and "raw energy" but the RN version is simply stronger. It displays stronger musicianship, more effective structure (use of that 'solo' riff), complementing verse melodies ("with you, you see" and "with you", respectively), and that sweet three-part harmony to close it off. Plus it's way catchier. And there's a triangle! (I think) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2005 | Posts: 1919 | Location: In a glass case of emotion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:57 pm
golly andrew wrote: And there's a triangle! (I think) Sounds kind of like bells to me.  _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:06 pm
I like Room Noises the best. In my opinion, Sherri's melody and vocals sounds better when the song is sped up, and the bass line is much more powerful. Plus, I prefer the arrangement this time around. Personally, it's not a favourite Eisley song of mine, so I'm fairly indifferent, but that's my input. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 | Posts: 2130 | Location: varies.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: i like both. Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:14 pm
i like both. but i like the Laughing City Version better. the gutar sounds kinda do it for me.i like the distortion better. the fade insound is also cool.but i also like the room noises version cause it's faster. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 08 Oct 2005 | Posts: 3099 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Telescope eyes - Room noises or Laughing City version??
Page 2 of 2 << prev | goto page
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
