| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Post subject: While we're on the topic of Pat Blashill...Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 12:03 pm 
As I first suspected, our old friend over at Rolling Stone isn't a woman--he's a man. I did a search and found out a little about him. I think someone posted something about Pat being a woman, and I guess everyone (myself included) assumed that was true. Anyway, I just thought I'd share that, as it sort of changes things with regards to his opinion of Eisley and his opinion of nu-metal... |
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 |
|
|
   |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 12:06 pm
not having a go at you personally but i dont understand why people are going all crazy's about the whole thing, its just an opinion that someone has who works for a music mag, and unless rolling stone controls the whole of the US music buying public i shouldnt think its that much to worry about. _________________ "A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat which isn't there." - Charles Darwin (legend) |
|
|
Joined: 04 Apr 2003 | Posts: 1296 | Location: Gateshead - good ol' blighty, up north
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 12:08 pm
Yeah, I agree with you that it shouldn't be such a huge deal to get one negative review. However, I just thought that people would like to know that he is a he. You're definitely right that people are over-reacting to it a bit, though, although I can understand that Boyd and Kim would be upset by it (I would be if I had kids that were doing something amazing and someone spoke badly of it). |
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 6:00 pm
it's a HIM!!? LET ME AT HIM!!! grrrrr.... (sound of ripping flesh and bone crunching chomps) Nah. It's awl gud bro...sure bro...he's a bro...it'z awl gud. I like that bro. ok. but seriously, I'm over it. I don't care anymore. Read my closing statements on the main thread where I found my peace. But now I'm embarrassed that it wasn't a chick. sheesh. All of our psycho-gender points just sorta crumbled, ehh? _________________ EisleyWebGuy "The industrialists never saw the fruit of their own labor - Post Moderism, which I now proclaim as dead. Their forefathers digital revolutionists, have accelerated the final resolve by punctuating an end to our chaotic journey with a new manifesto and a new era: The Age of Meaning." (manifesto's sold separate) Welcome: Illuminists |
|
|
Joined: 04 Nov 2002 | Posts: 5180 | Location: Tyler, Texas
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 6:18 pm
Wow, I thought pat was a woman as well. I'm such a presumptuous prick.  _________________ https://soundcloud.com/kiteswithoutstrings/tracks |
|
|
Joined: 03 Jan 2003 | Posts: 476 | Location: Austin TX
|
|
 |
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 6:42 pm
boyd wrote: it's a HIM!!? LET ME AT HIM!!! grrrrr.... (sound of ripping flesh and bone
crunching chomps) Nah. It's awl gud bro...sure bro...he's a bro...it'z awl gud. I like that bro. ok. but seriously, I'm over it. I don't care anymore. Read my closing statements on the main thread where I found my peace. But now I'm embarrassed that it wasn't a chick. sheesh. All of our psycho-gender points just sorta crumbled, ehh? Eh, at least you can rely on plenty of established psycho-gender points know that "Pat" is a male. Oh well, that's that, and what's not that isn't... 
|
|
|
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 | Posts: 2290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 6:36 am
I agree with Juan. If you read my reaction, it was a one liner. Boyd is the one with all the words and reactions. My reaction stands, "Rolling Stone does not control my kid's future." That's it for me. I do appreciate that it has offended a lot of EISLEY fans. Let the fans tear it up! |
|
|
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 | Posts: 3695 | Location: Tyler, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:44 am
me and 10 pages of other's words took delight in expressing our thoughts. I didn't start the thread...or post first that Pat was a girl. But he likes Pappa Roach. Does that qualify him to roast eisley? _________________ EisleyWebGuy "The industrialists never saw the fruit of their own labor - Post Moderism, which I now proclaim as dead. Their forefathers digital revolutionists, have accelerated the final resolve by punctuating an end to our chaotic journey with a new manifesto and a new era: The Age of Meaning." (manifesto's sold separate) Welcome: Illuminists |
|
|
Joined: 04 Nov 2002 | Posts: 5180 | Location: Tyler, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|
