
|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Mystic210 wrote: And like Nowhere Man said, the double lead on the album was unique and cool...having it for both verses makes it slightly less building. My thoughts exactly. When I first heard the Room Noises version, I really liked it because it was so different. Saving the double lead for the second verse, in my opinion, was a nice touch since it's rather unexpected. After hearing the other version a couple years later I felt it was sort of too much of a good thing. Sort of like too much salt on your fries or too much butter on your popcorn! _________________ My name is actually Sarah. Facebook. Twitter. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 | Posts: 750 | Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
|
sukieinthe_g wrote: Mystic210 wrote: And like Nowhere Man said, the double lead on the album was unique and cool...having it for both verses makes it slightly less building. My thoughts exactly. When I first heard the Room Noises version, I really liked it because it was so different. Saving the double lead for the second verse, in my opinion, was a nice touch since it's rather unexpected. After hearing the other version a couple years later I felt it was sort of too much of a good thing. Sort of like too much salt on your fries or too much butter on your popcorn! i agree, as well. i always loved the RN version specifically due to the second verse. _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
|
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
|
|
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 | Posts: 27 | Location: Washington
|
|
|
Joined: 25 Sep 2008 | Posts: 58 |
|
|
|
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 | Posts: 1313 |
|
|
|
Joined: 25 Sep 2008 | Posts: 58 |
|
|
|
Joined: 01 Jun 2008 | Posts: 836 |
|
|
|
Joined: 25 Sep 2008 | Posts: 58 |
|
|
|
Joined: 30 Sep 2006 | Posts: 1419 | Location: Maine
|
|
|
I kinda have a feeling we aren't supposed to post it on the forum since it's one of the stolen songs... right? even if it is on youtube. _________________ |
|
|
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 | Posts: 431 | Location: Tex-Ass
|
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
|
patrock wrote: tragedienne wrote: I kinda have a feeling we aren't supposed to post it on the forum since it's one of the stolen songs... right? even if it is on youtube. I think the thread would get locked if someone posted a link to the song. Yeah that's what I was thinking haha. _________________ |
|
|
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 | Posts: 431 | Location: Tex-Ass
|
|
|
tragedienne wrote: patrock wrote: tragedienne wrote: I kinda have a feeling we aren't supposed to post it on the forum since it's one of the stolen songs... right? even if it is on youtube. I think the thread would get locked if someone posted a link to the song. Yeah that's what I was thinking haha. We can't forget the lynching. |
|
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 | Posts: 2890 | Location: Oregon
|
|
|
Joined: 25 Sep 2008 | Posts: 58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Old Brightly Wound?
Page 4 of 6 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|


